The 20 Best Timex Watches For Men - The Ultimate List of Affordable Timex Watches
(This page features affiliate links, for more information click here.)
When I was growing up, Timex watches were minging. They looked bland, felt cheap, and sounded even worse. But Timex turned out to be the ugly kid from school who grew up to become a millionaire OnlyFans model. Why couldn’t I have been that ugly kid?
Indeed, out of all the affordable watch brands I’ve looked at, Timex is one of the best at making their budget watches look expensive. In fact, they’ve released some of the outright best watches under five hundred quid over the last couple of years. Now, admittedly, they’re not all made equal. Like most budget brands, for every banger, they’ve got three or four that are bang average at best. That’s just the way it is, some hit and some miss.
So today, I thought it would be interesting to show you the most extreme ends of this spectrum. Here are twenty of the very best Timex watches I’ve tried over the last few years, as well as a handful that I’d actually recommend steering clear of.
Continental Q80 Digital
Surprisingly, I’m going to start off with digitals, which isn’t something usually associated with Timex. Sure, they’ve got the Ironman series, which is fairly well-known, and we’ll get to that in a minute. Aside from that, though, they’ve struggled to compete with the likes of Casio...until now, perhaps.
The Continental Q80 is Timex’s latest effort in this category and, in many ways, is their best so far. With full stainless steel construction, a sleek, thin case, an Indiglo backlight, and a clean design, reminiscent of the PRX digital but far less money, the Q80 is the first decent Casio alternative we’ve seen for some time. In fact, Casio’s most direct competitors to this, the steel-cased A1000 and the Casiotron reissue, both suffer from major flaws in design or pricing that make this Timex feel even more competitive.
Compared to the most popular digital watches, like the old resin Casios, this one is quite a bit larger, at 39mm across, which could be decisive depending on your wrist size. I always get commenters telling me that the nice-looking Casios are too small for them, at around 32-35mm, so this 39mm option may tick a lot of people’s boxes. That said, if you like the more subtle ‘disappears-on-the-wrist’ feel you get with those small Casios, you may want to look elsewhere.
Despite being well-integrated and constructed of solid steel links, the bracelet also suffers from a sub-par clasp that lacks any form of microadjustment, which is a real oversight. As such, if a strap-equipped version comes out at any point, I’d certainly lean towards that instead if you can. Still, the Q80 is a strong and remarkably stylish digital watch, with all the core functions you need, as well as 5bar water resistance and a mineral crystal, which are both upgrades over most Casios. Not perfect, but certainly one of the better digital contenders.
Timex Ironman
For more performance-focused digitals, the Ironman range is the obvious place to head. This sports-focused range has proved successful ever since it was introduced in the 1980s, originally as a development of Timex’s existing triathlon range, targeting professional athletes.
These days, I’d say the Ironman series is seen as more of a durable G-Shock alternative by the general public, given its rugged construction and strong aquatic performance. Of course, you can use this for its intended purpose if smartwatches aren’t your thing, given its many onboard timing functions.
Crucially, the Ironman watches are cheaper than most G-Shocks and are often smaller too, which could make them an outright better choice for your use case.
I’ve always preferred even smaller watches like the Casio F-91 for weekend work, but if you want a time-tested classic that can take a licking, the Ironman will keep on ticking...well it would if it had a seconds hand! Actually, Timex just introduced an analog Ironman watch, but I’m not sure exactly how I feel about it.
Next, we move to GADA watches. The ‘Go Anywhere Do Anything’ models you can easily wear both for fun or for more formal occasions if required.
Timex Marlin Jet
Timex has some really unique offerings in this category, the first of which is the Marlin Jet. I reviewed this one when it released, and the visuals absolutely blew me away. With its all-encompassing crystal that wraps entirely around the bezel, together with the curved dial and polished accents, the Marlin Jet really lived up to it’s space age naming. Despite having a really basic Perlon strap and a fairly chunky profile, this one still has a surprisingly luxurious air for a watch that cost me well under £300.
At first, the Jet looked like it was going to be a limited edition release, though this silver/white has since returned in some regions, and they’ve also added some new versions to the lineup, though I think the original remains the optimal choice.
It’s automatic, with a steel case and, as you may have guessed from the insane form factor, an acrylic crystal. At 38mm, it’s also sized really nicely for most arms.
Far from a spec monster, but there’s truly nothing else like the Marlin Jet on the market right now, especially at this price. One of the most unique and sexy watches you can get for the money.
Q Timex Falcon Eye & Degrade
Things get even more wild when we get to our next pair of quartz watches, the Q-Timex Falcon Eye and Degrade. Both of these offer the same sort of thing. They’re each reissues of vintage Timex models from the late 1970s with modern materials and finishing touches.
What they also have in common are the ridiculous dial surfaces. These two are wild, with vertical wave-like patterns that are actually pretty impressive for watches that usually retail for well under £200. I mean, they aren’t for the faint-hearted, especially the brighter Falcon-Eye, but they are at least extremely cool.
The Degrade even takes this a step further with an internally faceted crystal, whose subtle creases align perfectly with the dial peaks beneath. Together, these are among the sportiest watches on this list, with their hooded lugs and steel bracelets, though I suspect you could easily pull them off with some more formal wear, especially if you opt for the more restrained colors the Falcon Eye now ships in.
The Degrade is marginally the better-made of the two, with nicer brushing on the case and a better quality bracelet. However, both are guilty of harboring loud ticking noises and scratch-prone acrylic crystals, which can be annoying. If you can overlook that, these offer some super jazzy vibes for relatively little cash. I still have the smaller Degrade in my collection, and it sees occasional use, mainly thanks to the cool styling.
E-Line 1983 Automatic
Another watch with cool styling is the Timex E-Line Automatic. Now, this is the definition of a GADA watch, with an even more versatile design than the last three. It’s also the definition of an insane-value watch...I mean, just look at it. What. A. Beauty!
The E-Line looks straight out of a luxury design magazine, sharing many of the same sporty characteristics as much higher-end watches, for a meager £199. Not only that, but it’s better specced than the last two as well, as this even packs in an automatic movement and a better-finished steel case, which is really the unsung hero here. It’s perfectly sculpted, scooping up that squared-off crystal, and Timex has managed to keep the whole package pretty slim, considering it’s using a chunky Miyota 8217.
Don’t let the size put you off, either. It may technically be 34mm, but if you’ve ever tried a square watch, you’ll know they wear a heck of a lot larger. This is much more like a 37mm watch, so while it’s hardly large, it’s much more viable than you’d initially expect. Here it is on my 6 ¼ inch wrist, a place it’s occupied more times than I can count over the last few months. Frankly, it’s a struggle finding anything I couldn’t wear with the E-Line automatic.
The bracelet certainly adds to that ‘flexibility’ in more ways than one. Most versions ship on this expansion band, which is by far the best of its type that I’ve come across. It’s got this clever adjustment system, meaning you can change the size in seconds, and overall, it doesn’t pluck nearly as badly as other expansion bands I’ve tried; the flawless five-star reviews on the Timex site suggest I’m not alone in that assessment. Other colors and versions are available with a leather band instead, but I’d urge you to give it a chance, an absolute do-it-all bargain.
Marlin Reissue
For an even dressier take, the Marlin line is another avenue worth exploring. The most popular in this range is this handwound 34mm reissue, although there are also other 40mm automatic versions available, with updated visuals.
What struck me was just how thin the hand-wound version is. Now, the movement inside isn’t very impressive, it’s just a Chinese Sea-Gull mechanical, but boy, is the resultant form factor ideal for this watch. It looks and feels just like a vintage, mid-century watch, with the domed crystal and sunburst dial. Because of the tiny movement, you also get a super sleek on-wrist profile that gives you even more of that Mad Men aesthetic.
The Marlin is a watch I think you’re either going to love or hate. It’s got unusual markers and hands, particularly on the standard Champagne-dial model and it’s also underwhelming as far as specs go. Still, the stock strap is decent, the movement is quiet enough and the sunburst dial is impressive too.
Timex also makes other variants of this watch from time to time, including this chocolate brown model. With its silver detailing, it could be argued that this version surpasses the original in terms of looks...who knows what they’ll come out with next.
Timex Midtown
For a far more modern take, it’s worth keeping your eyes out for the now-discontinued Midtown. This minimalist model is still available for under a hundred quid on a couple of grey market sites and offers some really cool details, including a curved chapter ring that contains these intriguing cut-out hour markers that look great up close.
It’s got reasonable materials for the money and is a crowd-pleasing 38mm wide, but does lack Indiglo, which its forebearer, the Fairfield used to have.
Timex Galli
You’ll probably have a bit more luck finding the Galli S1, which is among Timex’s most expensive offerings. This model here is also a 38mm watch, they used to make this one in 41mm as well, and I’m not sure this green one is available any more either, but there are some more versatile colors still on offer.
What do you get for the step up to around £400? Well, you get a case that’s absolutely insane. Now, the first unit I tried did have a botched bezel release notch, which was eventually switched after some back and forth with Timex. Looking past that error, this injection-molded case is otherwise a borderline masterpiece.
The brushing and polishing are immaculate, the whole shell is hollowed out, and you get ringed engravings across the inner case area, as well as on the crown. If you switched the logo, you’d think the Galli S1 was a multi-thousand-dollar watch, no questions asked. The Miyota 9039 powering it also aids the illusion, giving the second hand a noticeably smoother sweep than the other automatics on this list. If you can shell out for the Galli, it’s money mostly well spent, just check the QC when you receive it.
Continental GMT
I was pretty impressed when I received the new 39mm Continental GMT, mainly because it reminded me of the Tissot PRX for a lot less money. Indeed, this integrated bracelet quartz watch starts from around £145 and not only packs in a textured dial but even that added GMT complication for almost half the cost of the closest Tissot equivalent.
The case finishing is surprisingly good, the case itself is pleasingly thin for a GMT, and you can grab it on either a steel bracelet or a modified rubber strap. The crystal here is only mineral, and the lume is mediocre at best, but in most scenarios, the Continental is a pretty snazzy watch, with extra features for a competitive price. I do wish they’d change the bracelet clasp, though, as while it fits me, the lack of micro-adjustment holes may be a barrier.
Q-Timex Dive-Style GMT
Creeping into dive-style watches now, you’ll likely also come across another GMT, this time the similarly named ‘Q-Timex GMT’. This is basically a reworked version of the Q-Timex reissue that saw major success back in 2019, with its sporty styling and moderate price tag.
The GMT version is better than the original in virtually every way. It’s got a more detailed dial, has an improved bracelet and also comes in a more stylish assortment of colors. Side by side, it really is no contest. The original almost looks like a knock-off in comparison.
Not only is this GMT really skinny, like the last one, but the 38mm width makes it even more versatile. Overall, I love this watch and it sees a ton of wrist time, which I’ve always considered more important than strong on-paper specifications. Unlike some other Timex quartz watches, this one is also dead-silent as it uses a Swiss movement, rather than the noisier Chinese and Japanese movements usually used by Timex.
My primary headache is just the lack of adjustment holes, despite the bracelet being better than its forebearer. The links are quite small, but it’s far from ideal. I’ll definitely test this one out on more straps in the future, but even with this downside, I still love it. For a retail price of around £200, you really can’t get a better GMT for the money.
Harborside Coast
When browsing the Timex site, you may notice the Rolex-looking Harborside coast. At first, this one looks like a strong low-end contender, coming in at an aggressive price (especially on grey market sites) and with a very thin case that still retains a decent 100m water resistance rating. I hoped it might be a good Casio Duro rival, and while it makes an ok first impression, I’m afraid it didn’t quite meet my expectations.
The snazzy sunburst dial may have been an attention-grabber, but the scratchy-sounding bezel almost grabbed the attention of my entire neighborhood...and not for the right reasons! The most frustrating part is the case. While it’s sleek, it’s also constructed of low-lead brass, which I only realized after spotting the sub-par case brushing. This material simply doesn’t cut it at this price in the modern era and is bound to age worse than alternative stainless steel options.
In summary, I’d avoid this one and go for other brand offerings like the Casio Duro.
Deepwater Reef
If you wanna stick with Timex, the Deepwater Reef watches are generally far better options, though they are more expensive. The most popular model is the £400 Deepwater Reef titanium, with its sexy titanium case. It’s so popular, in fact, that it’s sold out at the time of making this post, so for now, you’ll have to cope with my images of the lower-cost steel quartz version instead.
Unlike the previous watch, this one is actually a solid option, with a sapphire crystal, 200m of water resistance, a screw-down crown, and even an Omega-inspired wave-adorned dial. The hour markers are even created out of solid blocks of luminescence, giving the Deepwater Reef bright low-light performance that trumps most sub-$200 offerings. That’s quite rare for Timex, for whom lume has never been a strength.
This watch offers some of that retro skin-diver shaping, with the squared-off lugs and, in this instance, a gunmetal PVD coating with much better finishing than I expected from the stock images. Other versions do come with the typical steel finish.
While not ceramic, the bezel has a clean, precise action with no backplay and even the strap packed a surprise. The quality is great, the buckle is nicely case-matched, and it even has this slick cubby hole you can use to tuck away the excess. Even the holes are tightly bunched together, so you can make finer-than-average adjustments. You can grab the Deepwater Reef models on steel bracelets, too, but honestly, I’d save the cash and stick with the rubber strap instead.
Overall, this feels like a genuinely viable Casio Duro alternative, where you can spend a bit more to get a bit more watch. You get improvements to the strap, lume, case finishing, crystal, and sizing, with its widest point being 41.5mm at the bezel, with a 40mm case size. If you enjoy or prefer quartz, this diver should be on your radar; it even comes in a GMT version, if you’re feeling extra curious.
Waterbury Flyback Chronographs
Now, I was looking for some cool Timex chronographs and ended up finding quite a few.
The most unique offerings were their pair of pilot-themed Flyback Chronographs, with their unconventional retro layouts. Here we have the standard black Flyback, as well as this special edition Pan Am version, with the added two-tone bezel.
As you can probably tell, these offer some added functionality over a standard quartz chronograph, but they actually have even more going on than you might think. Timex usually relies on Japanese third party movements from the likes of Seiko and Miyota, but here they’re using what appears to be an in-house “Intelligent Quartz” 363 module, made in the Philippines. Not much is known about this movement, and the absence of documentation makes understanding it unnecessarily tricky, but you can learn about all its functions via the online manual, and some of them are quite clever.
First up, you have the namesake flyback functionality. With normal chronographs, you can time stuff using the pushers. When starting a new lap, you have to pause the chronograph with the top pusher, reset with the lower pusher, and then restart the timing process again with the top pusher. Most of the time, you also have to wait for that chronograph to travel clockwise around the dial, back to 12.
These flyback watches are slightly different. While the chronograph hand is operating, you can instantly pop the bottom pusher, and it will near-instantly begin timing another lap. You’ll also notice that if the chronograph hand hasn’t yet passed the 6 o’clock marker, it will travel anti-clockwise to get back to the start position quicker. It also takes into account the time taken to move the hand, so it will always resume a couple of seconds into the next lap, to compensate.
What’s more, the chronograph hand boasts a mechanical-like sweep to it, and you can even activate other functions, such as tracking a second-time zone indicator and a special chronograph hand alignment feature, to ensure it never slips out of alignment!
Those features are undoubtedly neat, even if not the most readily used, but the unusual placement of those registers at 5 o’clock and 10 o’clock are what give these watches their distinct character. These give you a totally different vibe to almost everything in the sub-$200 category, where you often have many similarly-styled watches using the same handful of movements. These are primarily used for displaying elapsed time in hours and minutes.
The Pan-Am version is more expensive, at about £260, while the standard model is £100 less. As for which I prefer, well, I think the Pan-Am is better. The case is better finished, the dial is crisper, with more detail, and the bezel is silky smooth and satisfying. For the price, the 22mm strap is mediocre.
There are certain elements I prefer with the lower-cost model. The color scheme and hands are really period-appropriate, with the stretched-out date wheel being a particular highlight. The main downside here is the flatness of everything.
I still feel like they’re really interesting options for the money, given the exotic functions. They do only have mineral glass, though, so I’d still try to use a sizable discount code, if you can, to bring them down to a fairer price.
Q-Timex Chronograph
One watch that outdoes its price is the Q-Timex chronograph. On paper, this is nothing special; it’s got average materials and specs for a modern vintage-inspired quartz watch, but boy does it overdeliver in the flesh.
You don’t need a fancy camera or snazzy lighting setup to make this one look awesome; it does all the hard work for you. In fact, the Q chronograph would probably look good on your Nana’s dumbphone photographs.
The big, boxed crystal, the retro case shape, the glossy dial. Everything is on point. You might have noticed I bought two of these, and that’s because some of these colorways really give you a completely different look and feel. This braceleted navy version offers up some smart-casual feels, while the gilded version gives you a dressier 1920s ‘bling bling’ vibe, especially on this black leather strap.
Here it is on my 6.25 inch wrist. It’s a touch too big for me, at exactly 40mm, but still wears quite compactly due to the short, hooded lug arrangement, which allows the bands to drop off at steep angles if required. As for the straps themselves, well, they’re both serviceable. The black eco-friendly leather strap on this version is the weaker of the two options. It’s edge painted and has quick-release tabs, but the amount of surface creasing doesn’t fill me with optimism about its long-term durability. The bracelet is more promising, as while it again commits the crime of omitting micro-adjustments, it does at least have tiny links that make this a non-issue. You’ll probably get a good fit, and it’s a lot better than the bracelet on the standard Q-Timex.
For a regular quartz chronograph, the pushers here are also surprisingly satisfying to use, with a feel close to that of a meca-quartz or a budget mechanical movement. Under the hood here is the Seiko Epson YM12A, which I’m not sure I’ve ever encountered before. When factoring in its semi-smooth chronograph hand and overall quiet operation, this is definitely the best battery-powered chronograph movement I’ve tried, outside of meca-quartz options.
Out of the two colors, I undoubtedly prefer the Blue version. For some reason, the dial on this one is much more lustrous, with a shiny inky tone that looks much more high-end.
At a distance, the Q-Chronograph looks very luxurious for what’s often a sub-£200 watch, depending on the configuration. If you look closely, you will see where corners have been cut, but I’d struggle to name any chronograph that’s classier for the price. Gutted that this isn’t smaller for my tiny arm!
Marlin Chronograph
I have also briefly tried the Marlin Tachymeter Chronograph, which is a dressier Art-Deco-inspired alternative. The stock strap on that model is better than the Q, and it’s also pretty attractive in its own right, with a dressier design incorporating heavily stylized 1920s hour markers and a lovely sunburst finish.
This model is also 40mm wide and wears similarly to the Q, though it is pretty thick for a watch of its style. I’d have preferred the Marlin to be considerably thinner, even if a good portion is occupied by the steeply domed crystal. It does have a VK63 meca-quartz inside, which some would consider slightly better than that in the Q, and it also comes in some tasty vintage colors.
Personally, I still prefer the Q, but the Marlin is undoubtedly a viable substitute, especially if you want something with a dressier overall appearance.
Still, Timex’s bread and butter has always been and continues to be field watches. Timex has produced so many models over the years that it’s challenging to discern the winners from the losers. Luckily, I’ve tried most of them, and here are my overall thoughts.
Expedition Camper
I think there are two ways to go. First, if you’re on an extreme budget I’d recommend opting for the super low-cost Expedition camper watches. True, they are basic as far as construction is concerned, but hey, they’re dirt cheap, they’re light and comfortable, and many even ship with an Indiglo nightlight by default. Because they’re plastic, it doesn’t really matter when they inevitably get beaten up and you won’t have to worry too much about corrosion or anything like that.
Unless you can get them for a similar price, I’d generally avoid the more expensive brass-cased watches, of which there are a multitude on grey market sites. These watches, such as the Expedition Scout and Weekender, are ok but are rendered obsolete by rival military-inspired offerings from Japanese and Chinese brands. The likes of Lorus, Addiesdive, and Baltany all offer models with vastly better specs, materials, looks, and detailing for similar money.
You’re better off holding out for some of those more expensive £100+ models, which are much more competitive. In short, Timex offers its performance-centric Expedition range and its retro-inspired MK1 range. Now, I’m a sucker for mid-century designs, so the latter is my preferred camp. In fact, Timex revamped the MK1 line mere weeks ago, with these two pieces leading the way, the 40mm MK1 Automatic and the 36mm MK1 Mechanical.
At launch, these went viral on social media, and the automatic variant sold out almost immediately, partly off the back of some impressive product imagery and its Hamilton-like design. Now, the automatic is decent, and I can see why it sold out. It looks stunning on-camera, has a good strap, and it feels nice and sturdy thanks to the automatic movement.
Yet, the cheaper Mechanical is still my pick of the two. Of course, this one fits me better. I’m biased! But aside from that, I just think this has a cleaner, more attractive dial with more proportional numbers and text. Because it uses a smaller hand-wound movement, this version is substantially thinner, too, so the watch can accommodate pass-through straps with ease.
The 36mm also has a slightly darker dial, giving it a touch more contrast, that I think looks better.
Nonetheless, you can’t go wrong with either of these, with their primary shortcoming being the underwhelming 5-bar water resistance, which is on the lower side for a field watch. I also think the automatic is a little pricey, considering it’s only using a Miyota 8215, which is a basic and fairly loud automatic. The Seagull movement in the hand-wound model is also an entry-level choice, but I feel like the price gap between the two still shouldn’t be quite so large.
Expedition North Field Post Solar
If you’re more bothered about durability and function, the Expedition North Field Post collection is probably a better bet. Here, you have a choice between a 38mm mechanical and a solar, which ships in both 36 and 41mm variants. These offer up a slightly more modern look, with a stepped chapter ring, matte-blasted cases and a selection of tacti-cool colors that suit a 21st century aesthetic.
The mechanical is again, a decent Hamilton Khaki alternative, with a near-identical design, however it’s the solar model that really stands out to me. For a considerably lower cost, this one packs in everything you need. It’s got the sapphire crystal and the 10 bar water resistance the last one was missing, as well as that highly practical movement type. This model also offers a threaded crown and screwed caseback for extra aquatic peace of mind.
A boon of this movement is also the fact it isn’t plagued by the insanity-causing ticking noise characteristic of many lower-end Timex field watches. The strap is reasonable, but I still think it’s a good package overall, with the extra size options just being a bonus. I either lost or sold this watch a while back and do regret it, though the MK1 may still be my preferred choice.
Expedition Titanium Automatic
Timex also has some meatier options if you want something with a bit more wrist presence. The most popular choice in this category is probably the Expedition North Titanium. Despite sharing nomenclature with the previous two watches, this piece is quite the visual departure, with a completely different design and form factor. This black version is the 41mm automatic, which sits at around £330 at the time of publishing.
It gives off a similar vibe to the likes of the Citizen Promaster Super Tough, with that hardy, chunky vibe paired with big numbers and an expansive, high-contrast dial. The hands also chuck some pilot watch hints in there, leaving you with a purely rugged, militaristic appearance.
I’m unsure exactly what grade of titanium this model is made out of, but I get the immediate impression it will hold up better than most of Citizen’s Super Titanium watches, which perform far worse than you might expect. Perhaps I should compare the two one day?
Either way, this one has a nicely textured dial, a sapphire crystal, as well as strong low-light performance, thanks to the markers, which appear to be constructed directly from chunks of lume. Again, this one only uses the low-tier Miyota 8215, which is a shame, albeit its thickness doesn’t matter a great deal here, as bulbosity is already a part of this watch’s design.
This watch also comes in a 38mm quartz variant, though from the stock images, I think the dial on this one looks better executed. Both versions also say ‘shock-resistant’ and are apparently ISO 1413 certified. It’s not quite G-Shock levels of performance, but is an internationally recognised standard, so this model should hold up better than most other field watches.
The strap is again one of Timex’s eco-friendly reduced-water straps, which is pretty mid in terms of feel, as it’s quite dry and has a minuscule buckle, considering the watch’s size.
Tide-Temp-Compass
On the topic of size, we move now to the largest and arguably the coolest watch on this list. The new 45mm Expedition Tide-Temp-Compass. Now, this piece has some sweet party tricks that I think you’ll be pretty impressed by, this time powered by Timex’s M314 movement.
As the name suggests, it’s got pusher-operated functions that record the tide and temperature, and can also work as a make-shift compass. As someone with ADHD, I’d be lying if I said I’d made it through the manual, but I simply have to show you the compass feature. How sick is this?
If you fancy yourself as an adventurer and don’t want a smartwatch, I reckon this could prove to be a fairly useful device, and I have to say, I don’t think it’s that unattractive either. These more complex watches always have extra clutter, and, of course, this is no exception. The dial here is quite simplistic, with a lot of basic printing and rudimentary hour markers if you look closely. Yet, I can’t escape the feeling it’s actually fairly attractive, even if it dwarfs my tiny arm.
You may also notice the unusual bracelet. It’s halfway to an integrated bracelet with cheeky little end links, that appear to be screwed in place, and the bracelet then shifts to around 22mm wide just below. No microadjustments is really stupid here though, especially for an odd-shaped bracelet with large links.